Newcastle Falcons director of rugby Dean Richards

Newcastle boss Dean Richards reacts with fury to Ealing’s threat of legal action

have issued a strongly-worded statement following comments by Ben Ward over how from the could be met by a legal challenge from .

The cancelled the remainder of the 2019-20 season for the second tier and below, with Ealing 18 points behind leaders Newcastle.

Upon ending the Championship season prematurely last Friday, the RFU confirmed they will deliberate how to process promotion and that delivers ‘fair and balanced outcomes for the game’.

Trailfinders director of Ward told The Rugby Paper exclusively: “We’re taking counsel at the moment from a legal perspective as to what our position is.”

Newcastle had planned to keep silent before an RFU announcement in April, but said they had been forced to respond to Ward’s comments.

“At a time of national crisis we should be focusing all our attention on helping the most vulnerable, both within our own organisations and in wider society, rather than instructing legal representation,” Newcastle director of rugby Dean Richards said.

“The RFU have publicly committed to a review to decide the outcome of the league, and we had intended keeping a respectful silence to avoid any suggestion of influencing this process.

“However, with Ealing actively choosing to use the front page of a national publication to dangle the possible threat of legal action against this review, we no longer feel able to keep quiet.”

Falcons lay 18 points clear at the Championship summit having won all 15 of their league games.

But Ward stressed Ealing were in no way giving up on promotion given their schedule included a clash with Newcastle and a game in hand against bottom-of-the-table strugglers .

Going further with his comments, Richards slammed Ealing for their stance given the circumstances the world faces in containing the Covid-19 pandemic.

“Difficult decisions have to be made in these unprecedented times, when people’s lives and livelihoods are being lost,” a furious Richards added.

“If Ealing’s primary concern is whether they can bridge the 18-point gap between our two teams to gain promotion, then that reflects very poorly on them considering everything else going on in the world right now.

“Instead of spending money on legal counsel we will be directing it to those who need it most, and while Ealing might point out that their game in hand is against the bottom club in Carnegie, it should be considered that we also have a home game against Yorkshire Carnegie as one of our seven remaining matches.

“We have won all 15 of our league games this season, beating every single team in the division, including a bonus-point victory away to Ealing in a match which saw them gaining no points in the standings. Our players and supporters have been outstanding all season, in a huge collective effort.

“Ealing, meanwhile, have lost two and drawn one of their 14 games in the league despite having played a game less than us, and their remaining eight fixtures would have seen them playing against the two teams who have already defeated them – ourselves and .

“We fully appreciate that having an RFU review to decide the outcome of the season is not a perfect situation, but these are not perfect times.

“Anyone with any sense of reason or fairness can see what should happen, but rather than using the pages of a national publication to discuss legal action we will just allow this process to reach a logical conclusion.

“There are more important focuses for our attention and resources at this incredibly testing time, which makes Ealing’s public position all the more distasteful.”

Leave a Comment