Nick Cain: Let George go, Saints, or risk his goodwill

George North is box office, and although he had to wait until last Friday night for his first try for Northampton since moving to Franklin’s Gardens over the summer, he has made an impressive start.
The try he scored against Sale was donated to him by Jamie Elliott’s generous offload when he could have easily scored himself. Perhaps the selfless gesture to his fellow wing was prompted by the brilliant run by the strapping Welshman which created the wonder try finished off by Elliott at Kingsholm the previous weekend.
Irrespective, Jim Mallinder must be delighted with the way North has settled in and brought his gifts to bear for Northampton in the first month of the season – foremost among them extraordinary elusiveness and nimble footwork for such a big man.
That’s why it is puzzling that this week the Saints director of initiated what could become a tug-of-war between and Northampton for North’s services.
Asked about North’s availability for the last of Wales four autumn Tests, against , which falls outside the IRB’s official international window, this was Mallinder’s response.
“It would be our choice. We will decide what’s best for him…the club and George will have that discussion and do what’s best for us both.”
northpull-printThat smacks of the no-choice option a dad taking his kids into a Chinese takeaway might offer:  “What rice you want?” They shout “Egg fried rice!” while he orders plain.
North is a Grand Slam Wales wing, a prodigious young player who has made such spectacular headway in large part because of ‘s ability to talent spot. His 2013 fame is a direct product of that, as is Northampton’s desire to sign him.
North, who became the first teenager in Test history to score ten tries was capped 21 times by Wales before his twentieth birthday – and now, at 21, he has 31 caps for his country, and three Lions Test caps, including two tries, in a winning series.
It is inevitable that he will want to play for his country against Australia at the Millennium Stadium on November 30, even though Northampton’s away Premiership assignment against falls on the same day.
That is not disloyalty to Northampton, it is simply a desire to play for his country on ‘s biggest stage, which is still the international arena. Would Mallinder, when he was in his pomp as a full-back, have passed up another cap, at , to play for Sale?
It would be surprising if North’s agent had not negotiated a release clause with the Saints that allowed the wing to play in the only Wales home game that falls outside the IRB window.
What it probably comes down to is dosh. Northampton are well compensated by England for international player release, and they probably expect Wales to fork out some compensation money if they want North for an extra curricular match.
However, to jeopardise the goodwill of the player – who has the reputation of being a model pro – and of Wales coach Gatland, seems like unnecessary brinkmanship at this juncture.
Much better to give North a free pass this time, and then negotiate with the WRU regarding any future compensation for releasing him to Wales outside the agreed IRB periods in the build-up to the 2015 World Cup.

3 Comments

  1. nick. Have no doubt all the details especially release for all types of international duty will have been discussed when george signed his contract for the saints. For some reason Jim or indeed George have decided not to disclose all information to the rugby press (I can think of a few reasons why not). This leaves you to speculate on how thick the fog is, hubble bubble toil…etc, wry smiles all around at the gardens.

  2. I think Mr Cain is being rather naive if he thinks that George and his agent did not go over all this ground with Northampton before he signed. He’ll know where he stands and to suggest that he’s going to see his backside if the Saints decide that it’s not in their best interests as a club to let him join up with Wales is a little silly. And the issue should not be one of goodwill. The IRB has sanctioned windows and if the WRU or any other international union wants to organise games outside of it then they can only blame themselves if they don’t have their best players available. Perhaps they should look at the financial shambles that is the non-international game in Wales and get that sorted out so they can keep their players in the principality.

  3. He has a release clause in his contract

Leave a Comment